STRATJURIS LAW PARTNERS
Beyond Sight and Sound: India Embraces Olfactory Trademarks Non-Conventional Marks under the Trade Marks Act, 1999 Case: Sumitomo Rubber Industries case In a landmark development for Indian trademark jurisprudence, the
SUPREME COURT GAVE AN UNDERUSED PROVISION A MOMENT IN THE SPOTLIGHT: Transfer of Patent Infringement Suit from Delhi to Bombay for Consolidation with Groundless Threat Suit Sections: 106 and 104
Patentability of Process for Recovery of Potassium Sulphate and By-Products: Division Bench Remands Matter on Inventive Step Facts: Tapas Chatterjee filed a patent application (No. 201911036748) for a process to
Patent Appeal Highlights Procedural Fairness and Inventive Step Evaluation Case: Stromag Gmbh vs The Controller General Of Patents on 4 September 2025 (Calcutta High Court) The Patents Act, 1970 (as
Patent Showdown: Kubota Triumphs in Jurisdiction Dispute Against Godabari Godabari Agro Machinery Patents: Section 48(a); Section 20 of CPC, Rule 10 of the CPC The appeal concerns a patent infringement
Albemarle v. Controller: Delhi High Court Upholds Right to Narrow Claims on Appeal Background Albemarle Corporation, a US-based company, filed an appeal under Section 117A of the Indian Patents Act,
REATA PHARMACEUTICALS V. CONTROLLER: Clarifying Patentability And Evidentiary Standards Reata Pharmaceuticals Inc. vs Deputy Controller of Patents and Designs on (Order date: 12th June 2025) Sections 3(d) and 3 (e)
Patent Sealed, Design Denied: Dura-Line Scores Legal Victory Patents: Section 104, section 64(1); Design: Section 22 In Dura-Line India Pvt. Ltd. vs. Jain Irrigation Systems Ltd., the Court dealt with
Patent on the Menu: Economizing Enzymes Wins at the Appeal Court Section 2(1)(ja), Section 3(d), Section 3(i) In Kemin Industries vs Controller of Patents, the Court had to determine whether
Delhi High Court Ruling Strengthens Patent Enforcement: Philips Wins Long-Standing SEP Dispute Over DVD Technology, With Severe Damages for Infringers Section 8 and Section 48 In a significant ruling about
