
Patentability of Process for Recovery of Potassium Sulphate and By-Products: Division Bench Remands Matter on Inventive Step Facts: Tapas Chatterjee filed a patent application (No. 201911036748) for a process to

Patentability of Process for Recovery of Potassium Sulphate and By-Products: Division Bench Remands Matter on Inventive Step Facts: Tapas Chatterjee filed a patent application (No. 201911036748) for a process to

Patent Appeal Highlights Procedural Fairness and Inventive Step Evaluation Case: Stromag Gmbh vs The Controller General Of Patents on 4 September 2025 (Calcutta High Court) The Patents Act, 1970 (as

Patent Showdown: Kubota Triumphs in Jurisdiction Dispute Against Godabari Godabari Agro Machinery Patents: Section 48(a); Section 20 of CPC, Rule 10 of the CPC The appeal concerns a patent infringement

Albemarle v. Controller: Delhi High Court Upholds Right to Narrow Claims on Appeal Background Albemarle Corporation, a US-based company, filed an appeal under Section 117A of the Indian Patents Act,

When most people think of inheritance, they picture family homes, cherished jewellery, or perhaps a well-stocked bank account. But in today’s knowledge-driven world, some of the most valuable legacies a

REATA PHARMACEUTICALS V. CONTROLLER: Clarifying Patentability And Evidentiary Standards Reata Pharmaceuticals Inc. vs Deputy Controller of Patents and Designs on (Order date: 12th June 2025) Sections 3(d) and 3 (e)

Patent Sealed, Design Denied: Dura-Line Scores Legal Victory Patents: Section 104, section 64(1); Design: Section 22 In Dura-Line India Pvt. Ltd. vs. Jain Irrigation Systems Ltd., the Court dealt with

In Indian patent law, a party aggrieved by a decision of the Controller has two primary remedies: filing an appeal under Section 117A or seeking a review under Section 77(1)(f)

“Just as the tallest tree owes its majesty to the soil that nurtured its seed, every GI-tagged product carries the essence of its birthplace; where geography, tradition, and ingenuity converge.”

Patent on the Menu: Economizing Enzymes Wins at the Appeal Court Section 2(1)(ja), Section 3(d), Section 3(i) In Kemin Industries vs Controller of Patents, the Court had to determine whether