STRATJURIS LAW PARTNERS
Patent Sealed, Design Denied: Dura-Line Scores Legal Victory Patents: Section 104, section 64(1); Design: Section 22 In Dura-Line India Pvt. Ltd. vs. Jain Irrigation Systems Ltd., the Court dealt with
In Indian patent law, a party aggrieved by a decision of the Controller has two primary remedies: filing an appeal under Section 117A or seeking a review under Section 77(1)(f)
“Just as the tallest tree owes its majesty to the soil that nurtured its seed, every GI-tagged product carries the essence of its birthplace; where geography, tradition, and ingenuity converge.”
Patent on the Menu: Economizing Enzymes Wins at the Appeal Court Section 2(1)(ja), Section 3(d), Section 3(i) In Kemin Industries vs Controller of Patents, the Court had to determine whether
Delhi High Court Ruling Strengthens Patent Enforcement: Philips Wins Long-Standing SEP Dispute Over DVD Technology, With Severe Damages for Infringers Section 8 and Section 48 In a significant ruling about
Indian law mandates residents to adhere to the foreign filing license provisions outlined in Section 39 of the Patents Act of 1970, which states that patent applications must be filed
M/S. Haldor Topsoe A/S vs Controller of Patents & Designs on 2 January 2025: A Ruling on Natural Justice and Procedural Oversight Section 21, Section 15, Writ petition (Article 226)
Fair Play in Patent Law: High Court Resets the Stage for Evidence and Equity Article 226 (Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus) In a significant development in the Gilead Sciences Inc. vs
In a world where innovation propels success and creativity powers companies, it is more important than ever to protect your intellectual property. The significance of comprehending the subtle distinctions between
JANUARY 2025 Is it possible to file divisional application(s) in India on the day of grant of parent application? Section 16, Section 117A In a recent judgement dated November 28,
