
SUPREME COURT GAVE AN UNDERUSED PROVISION A MOMENT IN THE SPOTLIGHT: Transfer of Patent Infringement Suit from Delhi to Bombay for Consolidation with Groundless Threat Suit Sections: 106 and 104

SUPREME COURT GAVE AN UNDERUSED PROVISION A MOMENT IN THE SPOTLIGHT: Transfer of Patent Infringement Suit from Delhi to Bombay for Consolidation with Groundless Threat Suit Sections: 106 and 104

Copyright vs. Design Law: The Definitive Ruling on Engineering Drawings in Commercial Manufacturing For years, the overlap between copyright and design protection has raised challenging questions in Indian intellectual property

Patentability of Process for Recovery of Potassium Sulphate and By-Products: Division Bench Remands Matter on Inventive Step Facts: Tapas Chatterjee filed a patent application (No. 201911036748) for a process to

Patent Appeal Highlights Procedural Fairness and Inventive Step Evaluation Case: Stromag Gmbh vs The Controller General Of Patents on 4 September 2025 (Calcutta High Court) The Patents Act, 1970 (as

Patent Showdown: Kubota Triumphs in Jurisdiction Dispute Against Godabari Godabari Agro Machinery Patents: Section 48(a); Section 20 of CPC, Rule 10 of the CPC The appeal concerns a patent infringement

Albemarle v. Controller: Delhi High Court Upholds Right to Narrow Claims on Appeal Background Albemarle Corporation, a US-based company, filed an appeal under Section 117A of the Indian Patents Act,

When most people think of inheritance, they picture family homes, cherished jewellery, or perhaps a well-stocked bank account. But in today’s knowledge-driven world, some of the most valuable legacies a

REATA PHARMACEUTICALS V. CONTROLLER: Clarifying Patentability And Evidentiary Standards Reata Pharmaceuticals Inc. vs Deputy Controller of Patents and Designs on (Order date: 12th June 2025) Sections 3(d) and 3 (e)

Patent Sealed, Design Denied: Dura-Line Scores Legal Victory Patents: Section 104, section 64(1); Design: Section 22 In Dura-Line India Pvt. Ltd. vs. Jain Irrigation Systems Ltd., the Court dealt with

In Indian patent law, a party aggrieved by a decision of the Controller has two primary remedies: filing an appeal under Section 117A or seeking a review under Section 77(1)(f)